my lord told me he'd be an agnostic if he wasn't already an atheist.
J. Hofer
JoinedPosts by J. Hofer
-
288
Is it just me or has this site become a Believer/Atheist warzone?
by BU2B ini enjoy the odd thread about evoloution vs creation, etc but lately it seems that a large percentage of threads here devolve into fighting between atheists and theists and distract from what most of us here see eye to eye on, the wt and related things.
i wish things could be more civil here and fr people to realize that people will never see eye to eye on the topic.
it gets so tiring to see the contstant bickring and fighting on those threads.. they seem to go on page after page but very little of substance is discussed seeing as the existence or non existence of a god can be proven by anyone.
-
-
-
288
Is it just me or has this site become a Believer/Atheist warzone?
by BU2B ini enjoy the odd thread about evoloution vs creation, etc but lately it seems that a large percentage of threads here devolve into fighting between atheists and theists and distract from what most of us here see eye to eye on, the wt and related things.
i wish things could be more civil here and fr people to realize that people will never see eye to eye on the topic.
it gets so tiring to see the contstant bickring and fighting on those threads.. they seem to go on page after page but very little of substance is discussed seeing as the existence or non existence of a god can be proven by anyone.
-
-
J. Hofer
agnosticism isn't some politically correct spot between believers and atheists. it covers a completely different topic. agnosticism states that we can't know if there's some kind of higher being out there. indeed, we can't know if there's some form of creative energy hiding away in a different galaxy, in fact we can't even know for sure if there's a very tiny teapot orbiting our planet.
agnosticism is just a statement without a conclusion. the conclusions being: since there's no way to disprove god, i'll believe in him/her/it/them (which would be insane, but socially accepted in some western cultures), or: since there's no way to prove god, i won't believe in it (THIS being the only intellectual honest position to take).
-
-
-
J. Hofer
but you go on and say koalas swam from turkey to australia.
-
-
-
J. Hofer
exactly, unstop. the problem is, what you say is not true, so it's not correct reasoning. it's not only not true, it's mostly laughable ridiculous. i mean... c'mon, what's up with the koalas? kangoroos, platypuses anyone?
-
-
-
J. Hofer
paintings are painted, painters are conceived... what was the point?
-
-
-
J. Hofer
well, most people wonder how the two koalas hichhiked back to australia after the flood (caliber doesn't, i wonder if you agree with him)
-
41
Question for people more intelligent than me
by Monsieur indo we have concrete evidence of how the pyramids at giza were built?.
or is this still an unexplained 'mystery'?.
i've read that the stones used to build these things are monolithic?.
-
-
J. Hofer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_frigate_Hermione_(1779)
this frigate was built in 11 months, the plans were destroyed/lost, the ship sank. the french started a reproduction in 1997 and just now it is being completed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_frigate_Hermione_(2012)
i doubt that it's because of better technology being available in the 16th century.
-
-
-
J. Hofer
and if you see a koala you know they didn't walk to australia from the middle east.
-
-
-
J. Hofer
> jh : i answered your question genesis 6:2o god brought tghe animals to noah
no you didn't answer the question, that's only half the journey. after all we don't see koalas in the middle east nowadays, and no evidence whatsoever that any ever existed there. "god brought them" to the ark and then what? how did they get back? god brought them back as well? are you serious? what was the whole point of the ark then? and don't you feel a bit stupid when "believing" such a thing?
-
-
-
J. Hofer
and what about the wandering/seafaring koalas?